Hot exchanges at Jackson Supreme Court confirmation hearings

Former documentary filmmaker Sen. John Osoff (D.C.) asked Judge Jackson to discuss his views on press freedom, in which he has made several significant judgments in the past.

“Freedom of the press is one of the first constitutional freedoms under our democracy,” Judge Jackson said. 1964 New York Times Co. V. He cited Sullivan’s case, saying that the public could not sue the news outlets unless it was published with genuine malice or irresponsible negligence.

Published by the Press Corps for Press Freedom An analysis Judge Jackson’s press freedom lawsuits in U.S. District Court in Washington, DC, some of his decisions against press interests were reversed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Circuit District of Columbia, which he joined last year.

A defamation suit has been filed against the Bureau of National Affairs, an organization that covers legal and regulatory news, known as the Bloomberg Industry Group. A criminal defendant filed a defamation suit against BNA, which was actually reported by a prosecutor after a judge falsely reported that the defendant had no regrets for the murder. Judge Jackson dismissed the news agency’s request that the case be dismissed under the Sullivan model.

The then-appellate judge, Brett Kavanagh, now wrote an opinion that would replace Judge Jackson, the Supreme Court judge. He noted that the BNA relied on a partial copy of the sentencing hearing filed by the defendant, who did not specify who was speaking. “Studying the PNA transcript is not unreasonable and there is no evidence of real evil,” he wrote.

Most of Judge Jackson’s press cases involved the Freedom of Information Act. The panel of reporters, like Judge Jackson, found that, like most federal judges, information is withheld from the government when it comes to withholding information for national security reasons. But he also ruled against it when agencies “failed to provide sufficient evidence to keep records hidden from the public.”

See also  Rupert Murdoch is retiring from the boards of Fox and News Corporation

In a notable case handled by Judge Jackson, Senate Investigative Committee member James Wolf pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI during a leak investigation. Prosecutors argued that his personal relationship with a reporter should have increased his sentence.

Judge Jackson ruled otherwise. “It is not a crime to have a relationship with reporters. It is not a crime to give a reporter unclassified but important non-public information, ”he found.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *